Advanced Treatment Technologies
for
Livestock and Poultry Manures
and
AAFC's
Sustainable Development Strategy II
(SDS II)
(2001 - 2004)
"Sustainable Development
is a blending of environmental, social, and economic opportunities
that strives to meet the needs of the present without compromising
the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
AAFC's SDS II document provides the framework that will guide departmental
efforts over the coming years towards environmental, economic, and social
sustainability.
View complete SDS II document [3317 KB]
The purpose of this document is to demonstrate how anaerobic digestion
and related separation/recovery technologies can satisfactorily address
most of the major issues in livestock manure management for confined
livestock and poultry systems, where manure can be collected.
Each issue below is linked to a specific Strategic Direction
- an excerpt from the SDS II document
| Issue |
Treatment |
SDS II1
Agri-environmental and Agri-Social targets |
| Odour |
Anaerobic digestion2
(AD) can virtually eliminate odours in livestock and
poultry manures. Subsequent land application or other uses will
also be odour-free.
Ammonia emissions from manure
handling can also be reduced with closed vessel AD treatment.
Reducing pH to near 7.0 greatly reduces risk of ammonia emissions
.
Besides being an odour source, ammonia is now considered as
a toxic substance in the CEPA3
|
By
2006, there will be an increasing trend in the adoption by producers
of best management agricultural practices or technologies that
reduce emissions of odours and particulate matter.
View Strategic Direction 1 (702 KB)
The frequency and significance
of agriculture-related environmental issues will diminish.
Performance Measure:
1) Yearly report
from media scans and public opinion surveys.
View Strategic Direction 3 (309 KB)
|
| Pathogens |
AD typically reduces
pathogens by 90% or more. To ensure pathogen-free products,
a 1-hr thermophillic treatment (70° C) can be used.
Subsequent land application will have no risk of water contamination
by pathogens. Off-site value-added fertilizer products will
also be pathogen-free. |
By 2006,
there will be an increasing trend in the adoption of best practices
for water use by farms and food-processing facilities.
View Strategic Direction 1
(702 KB) |
| Greenhouse
Gas (GHG) Emissions |
Two most serious
GHGs in agriculture are methane (20x CO2) and Nitrous oxide
(320x CO2).
Methane is captured by A.D. and used for heat or for electricity
generation. Virtually no GHG losses from AD processing of manure.
Land-applied digestate containing nitrogenous compounds can
result in some periodic nitrous oxide production, but will be
less for AD-processed manure.. |
By 2006,
there will be a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture,
and an increase in the proportion of Canada’s farmland accumulating
soil organic carbon.
Performance Measure:
1) Agricultural
emissions of greenhouse gases; 2) Share of Canada’s farmland
accumulating soil organic carbon.
View Strategic Direction 1
(702 KB) |
| Nutrients |
Virtually all
nutrients entering AD are conserved, since it is a closed vessel
treatment. Keeping pH of digestion slurry near 7.0 will minimize
risks for subsequent ammonia losses.
Post AD separation and recovery
processes are capable of keeping nutrients (primarily N & P)
in digested product for subsequent land application,
OR
removing nutrients for production of off-site, value-added products
e.g. fertilizers/amendments.
Such products provide
a continuing source of revenue.
|
By 2006,
there will be an increasing trend in the adoption of best practices
for nutrient management.
Performance Measure:
Management of farm
nutrient inputs, nine sub-indicators: 1) Method of fertilizer
application; 2) Timing of nitrogen application; 3) Reduction
of fertilizers applied to offset nutrient content of manure;
4) Use of soil testing; 5) Storage method for liquid manure;
6) Storage method for solid manure; 7) Liquid manure storage
capacity; 8) Manure application method; and 9) Timing of liquid
manure application.
By
2006, there will be a decrease in the proportion of farmland
at intermediate and high risk of water contamination by nitrogen
and phosphorus in susceptible areas.
Performance Measure:
1) Share of farmland
where the risk of water contamination by nitrogen is low; 2)
Share of farmland where water contamination by phosphorus is
low.
View Strategic Direction 1
(702 KB) |
Eco-
Efficiency |
Rather than allowing
methane to escape into the air during manure storage and handling,
it's production is optimized in the AD process (closed vessel)
and used for power generation (heating, electricity).
This is referred to as "green power", since it is a form of recycling. Heating/Power
generation is revenue- generating (cost-recovery) |
By 2006,
there will be an increase in the ratio of agricultural output
energy over input energy.
Performance Measure:
1) Ratio
of energy output/energy input in agricultural systems; 2) Chemical
use intensity
View Strategic Direction 2 (294 KB) |
| |
|
|
1
- SDS II refers to AAFC's Sustainable Development Strategy 2001
- 2004
2 - In this context AD refers to mesophillic temperatures
(about 37°C)
3 - CEPA = Canadian Environmental Protection Act |
Footnotes:
-
Although these advanced manure treatment technologies have been
used for some time in various parts of Europe, and to a lesser extent
in the USA, their design and use is quite site-specific and requires
expert input into their design and operational procedures.
-
In Canada, there exists policy and regulatory barriers which
need to be addressed in order to foster the adoption of these "more
sustainable" technologies.
-
The economic success of these technologies usually depends upon
partnerships developed for their operation. Energy corporations
interested in fostering "green power" through distributed generation
are potential partners, as are municipalities, commercial alcohol
producers, greenhouse vegetable/flower facilities, animal rendering
operations, or other nearby livestock operations that could pool
resources.
-
At present, these advanced treatment systems are currently economically
viable for only medium-to-large size operations. Since the intent
of introducing these systems is NOT to foster mega-sized operations,
it is imperative to carefully regulate the size of livestock operations
based on community (social) values, as well as on environmental
principles. (See Community/Society
Section for further information).
Bruce
T. Bowman, Archivist
Last Updated:
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 08:53:17 PM
|