INTRODUCTION
 |
| Conventional tillage leaves less
than 30% residue. |
 |
| Mulch Tillage leaves more than 30%
residue. |
|
Producing high yields has always been an important part of
farming. When input costs were low compared to crop returns,
the best way to farm was to fertilize for maximum yields and
then, add a little extra. The feeling was that you could lose
more with too little input than with too much.
With the costs of fertilizer, fuel and other inputs increasing
and crop prices not keeping pace, the emphasis has changed.
Inputs are carefully measured so that the yield from each unit
is worth more than the cost of the input. The greatest yields
do not necessarily give the greatest profit.
In recent years, the focus has widened to include environmental
factors in the crop production equation. It is no longer acceptable
to ignore what happens beyond the fence because of the way we
farm.
Best management practices are tools for meeting today's agricultural
goals. To be a best management practice, an action must maintain
or increase crop returns while minimizing the impact on the
environment. There is no one system for all farms. The combination
of practices appropriate for your farm will depend on individual
problems and opportunities.
The first part of this booklet will help you understand the
basics such as soil management, residue management, crop rotation,
pest management, nutrient management as well as the importance
of using a systematic approach to change. The next three sections
focus on different types of tillage: conventional tillage, mulch
tillage and no-till/ridge tillage. And finally, the booklet
provides some non-tillage options that improve the environment.
|
The booklet cannot provide you with all the possible information.
Rather, it gives you the basics and provides references for further
reading.
Some terms used in this booklet may be unfamiliar. To avoid confusion,
we are using the following definitions for the different types of tillage:
Conventional tillage is any system which attempts to cover
most of the residue, leaving less than 30% of the soil surface covered
with residue (or crop remains) after planting. Usually, the moldboard
plow is used along with a variety of other tillage tools.
Mulch tillage is any system where soil is disturbed between
harvesting one crop and planting the next. However, in this case, more
than 30% of the soil surface is left covered with residue after planting.
Chisel plows, offset discs or modified moldboard plows are the common
implements. Other terms that you may hear to describe this system are
reduced tillage, minimum till or conservation tillage.
|
No-till is any system where the soil is not disturbed
between harvesting one crop and planting the next. Some tillage
may be done by attachments to planting equipment to assist seed
and fertilizer placement.
|

|
| Ridge tillage is a specific form of no-till
where crops are planted on pre-formed ridges. Inter-row cultivation
is done after the crop has emerged in order to control weeds
and re-form the ridges. |

|
You may wish to change your cropping system for many different reasons
such as: to save money, to increase yields, to save labour, to solve
erosion problems, or to reduce pesticide use. Whatever the reason, the
first stage of change is to assess where you are now and what your goals
are. Once you have done that, this booklet should help outline some
of the options available. Good luck!
REASONS TO CONSIDER CHANGING YOUR SYSTEM
On-Farm Concerns
Soil loss by erosion creates an economic loss because it removes
the most productive layer of soil first and exposes less productive
layers. Lower layers have less organic matter and fewer available nutrients.
Therefore, yield potential will drop. Eroded soil will require large
amounts of fertilizer to improve fertility and will be harder to manage
because of poor soil structure due to low levels of organic matter.
Soil loss is a waste of a basic resource which affects the farm's future
productivity.
See the section on Non-Tillage Options for more information.
Yield is affected by many factors: soil productivity, soil
type, drainage, weather, crop genetics and farm management. The best
way to improve yields may vary from field to field and even, within
one field. When making a decision on a tillage system, remember:
- Lower yields may not always mean lower profits. Different amounts
of time, equipment costs, input and management go into different
systems.
- Research comparing corn yields under different tillage systems
shows the following (see table). These results could vary with different
crops and different management.
|
CORN YIELD INDEX |
| SOIL TYPE |
MULCH TILL |
NO-TILL |
| SAND |
98 |
105 |
| LOAM |
99 |
97 |
| CLAY LOAM |
96 |
104 |
| CLAY |
92 |
94 |
Five Year Average (Moldboard
= 100) From 1991 Tillage 2000 Report
|
Farm input costs such as labour, fuel, and machinery decrease
as tillage decreases. Reducing inputs saves money and resources. Planting
a crop with fewer trips across the field increases productivity and
allows more timely planting.
Herbicide use may increase in the short-term with decreased tillage
as a result of using herbicide for spring weed burnoff to replace weed
control by tillage.
Problem weed species also change as tillage changes. This may cause
you to modify the herbicide program. Eventually, though, careful management
will reduce the need for herbicides. In a ridge till system, banding
herbicides will reduce application rates by one-half to two-thirds.
Reducing the number of field passes for planting reduces labour needs.
No-till and ridge till systems reduce labour by as much as one-third
to one-half from conventional tillage. Chisel plowing requires 25% less
labour than moldboard plowing.
In the long-term, reduced tillage reduces capital costs. As tillage
decreases, the need for large equipment also decreases. In a no-till
or ridge till system, the largest tractor required will be the one used
to pull the planter (or grain buggy). Most farmers keep their plows
when they move to a new system until the system proves itself. Eventually,
farmers will be able to sell equipment that is no longer needed. A good
opportunity to make changes comes when an old plow needs replacement.
Use the money that would have gone into buying a new plow for alternate
tillage equipment.
Equipment needed for tillage systems:
- Machinery inventory for conventional tillage includes
the moldboard plow, disc, harrow and field cultivator.
- Switching to mulch tillage will require the purchase
of a chisel plow or offset disc. Higher residue levels may
require modification to cultivation and planting equipment.
For example, trash whippers may be needed to clear residue
ahead of planter units.
- Switching from mulch till to no-till requires the purchase
of residue coulters and trash whippers for the planter,
a heavier frame for strength and weight, and springs for
more downward pressure. It may also require purchase of
a new planter or drill.
- Starting into ridge tillage requires planter attachments
to clean the ridge top. Guide wheels or automatic guidance
systems keep the planter on the ridge. Special inter-row
cultivators are used between the ridges during the growing
season. To keep
- traffic off the ridge, wheel spacing must be adjusted
for all equipment.
|
"Renting or borrowing of equipment lets you look
before you leap."
|
|
|
Energy use declines with a reduction in tillage. See
the table below for more detail.
|
ENERGY REQUIREMENTS FOR DIFFERENT TILLAGE
SYSTEMS
|
| OPERATION |
TILLAGE SYSTEM
(Numbers show litres of diesel fuel/hectare)
|
| |
CONVENTIONAL |
CHISEL PLOW |
DISC |
NO-TILL |
| MOLDBOARD PLOW |
17 |
- |
- |
- |
| CHISEL PLOW |
- |
11 |
- |
- |
| DISC |
6 |
6 |
6 |
- |
| INCORPORATING HERBICIDES |
6 |
6 |
6 |
- |
| SPRAY HERBICIDES |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| PLANT |
4 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
| CULTIVATE (EACH TIME) |
4 |
4 |
4 |
- |
| MACHINERY AND REPAIR |
17 |
15 |
12 |
6 |
| TOTAL |
56 |
47 |
33 |
12 |
OFF-FARM CONCERNS
Sediment
Sediment, or eroded soil, deposited in Ontario waterways is a burden
to all. Financially, it increases the costs of maintaining drains and
shipping
channels. Environmentally, sediment can destroy fish habitat and
spoil recreational waters.
Sediment also contains soil nutrients and during spraying season,
pesticide residues which can contaminate surface water. When sediment
collects in one spot, at the bottom of a slope, for example, concentrated
levels of pesticides may be toxic to crops.
Tillage systems that reduce soil erosion decrease sediment. Also
see the section on Non-Tillage Options for more information.
Nutrients
Plant nutrients can be lost from any soil if nutrient application
rates are too high. Nitrogen may be lost by leaching, which contaminates
groundwater. Phosphates and potassium may be lost into surface water
with eroded soil. Excess phosphates are a particular concern in watercourses.
Tillage systems which leave a lot of residue on the soil surface,
reduce loss of nutrients by soil erosion. Residue also reduces run-off.
Nitrate loss is affected by adding more nitrogen (in the form of
manure, fertilizer or legume residues) than crops require.
Soil moving off the farm in run-off can carry nutrients and
pesticides into watercourses |
Pesticides
Pesticides can contaminate water because of the following:
spray drift, spills near wells or streams, or improper disposal.
However, entry into the water system may also result from surface
run-off or leaching to tile drains and groundwater from farm
operations.
Studies of major watersheds in Ontario have shown that few
pesticides are found in rivers. However, traces of some are
found during spraying season while others, such as atrazine,
appear year-round. The most effective ways to control pesticide
loss are by managing the soil to reduce run-off, improving handling
to reduce spills, proper sprayer calibration and using recommended
rates.
|
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
OF TILLAGE SYSTEMS
| |
ADVANTAGES |
DISADVANTAGES |
| CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE |
- Familiar to most farmers and machinery widely available
- Incorporates manure without specialized equipment
- Soil warms faster in the spring than with less tillage.
- Allows maximum frost action on soil. This breaks the
soil into smaller clumps.
- Low levels of surface residue permit high levels of
water evaporation. This allows earlier planting and is a
plus for poorly-drained soils.
|
- More equipment is needed than in reduced tillage systems
- Low residue levels make soil vulnerable to crusting
and erosion by wind and water.
- Tillage stimulates weed growth and reduces levels of
organic matter.
- Working wet soil may cause compaction and the development
of plow pans.
- During the growing season, high evaporation resulting
from lack of residue can reduce Crop yields.
|
| MULCH TILLAGE |
- Most of the same advantages as conventional tillage.
- Residue left on soil surface reduces erosion and water
run-off.
- Labour inputs are lower than in conventional tillage.
- Fewer trips over the field reduce costs.
- Management skill levels required similar to conventional
tillage.
|
- Tillage stimulates weed growth.
- High residue levels can slow soil warm-up in the spring.
- Primary tillage will not be effective under wet soil
conditions.
- High residue levels require attachments on the planter.
|
| NO-TILL/RIDGE TILLAGE |
- Lower input and capital expenses.
- Labour inputs per acre are greatly reduced.
- More organic matter is located near the surface, which
improves soil structure
- High levels of residue drastically reduce soil erosion.
- Increased biological activity in soil, which improves
structure and increases the speed of pesticide breakdown.
|
- High residue levels can slow soil warm-up.
- Success depends on the characteristics of the soil.
- Fewer options are available to work in manure.
- Above-average management skills are required.
|
LEARNING COSTS
Learning costs result from inexperience with a tillage system. Making
poor decisions or failing to perform a task necessary to the system's
success are examples. Mistakes can be costly because they affect time
requirements or yield. Research a system carefully before implementing
it. It may take a little extra time at the beginning, but will help
you avoid errors.
Experience has shown that it is wise to start small and expand a
new system as success allows. As one expert says, "A big mistake on
a small area is a small mistake, but a small mistake on a large area
is a big mistake."
Examples of learning costs:
- Trying to plant on the ridge without guide wheels. On the day
you want to plant, it is too late to find out that the planter won't
stay on the ridge.
- Trying to plant no-till into heavy corn residue and finding
that heavy-duty coulters are needed.
- Having to till a field an extra time to remove ridges and lumps
left by poor moldboard plowing.
Before selecting a tillage system, ask yourself the following questions:
- Will it work for my cropping and livestock system?
- Are other erosion control measures necessary?
- Is it suitable for my soil?
- Does it address the on and off-farm concerns in my area?
- Can I afford to make the necessary changes and buy the equipment?
- Do I have the management skills to make the system work?
- Can I get training, advice and information to improve my skills?
- Is there someone I can talk to whom has adopted the system successfully?
With proper preparation and consideration, farmers can adopt best
management systems for their farm.
Last Updated:
Friday, May 08, 2009 07:29:06 AM
|